Many of the major telescope manufacturers have a version of those. They make some really little ccds that will fit right into a standard eyepiece for about $100, but this will render mostly "hobbyist" photos. In color, could go on up to over a thousand. In monochrome, could range from $250 to 500, easy. I read up on it some at the sky and telescope site after I got unusual bumps in my film photos.Īnother area you might want to look into, if you are serious, is a CCD astrocam these are not DSLRs, but dedicated imaging equipment built to bolt onto a telescope. The periodic error was something I hadn't thought of when I was getting interested in mounts. That is why you will see so many of them on the market. They are not a magic bullet, but can be a great help. Robotic GOTO mounts have great slewing and navigation, but they also have their periodic errors and vibrations, too. Drive motor runs about $60, but it will have a period tick once every 15 minutes. If you have a long (like over twice as long as they usually are) 3/8 thread on a tripod, you might be able to get it tripod mounted by replacing the assembly bolt in the base of the system with your tripod stud. But, this one will help you get to know if you want to stand out in the cold and wait out some astrophotos. However, the finest EQ mounts will be thousands more. You could probably pass it on to your grandchildren, if you take care of it. I have found it is a reasonably sturdy, good-working, beginner-level mount. Comes with a camera-style tripod screw bracket it will let you put the camera directly on the mount by means of the tripod nut in the bottom of the camera body. If you have nothing to work with at all, and you need an equitorial mount, I'd recommend the Orion Mini-EQ. After that, anything that works better than a Holga without duct tape would probably do. For budgeting, it would pay to invest in the best mount available. The mount and some aspects of the telescope might be more important than the camera itself. Many, many of the photos we are used to seeing are done with some of the best scientific equipment around. Īlso, be sure to downshift your expectations on an object's apparent size and clarity in an image. To really get into the beginning end of things, it's going to be an 8" reflector as a common choice. I recommend you make some decisions about what kind of photo you want to take what, if any, other kinds of telescope mounting and optical tube assemblies you may have, etc. It's very easy to spend a lot of money fast in astrophotography.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |